Possible actions to assess protection gaps and exposure to NatCat risk

StakeholderStarting pointAdvanced actions
Governments• Facilitate the collection and dissemination of comprehensive NatCat data (data on economic losses and uninsured losses).
• Improve recording of fiscal spending on disasters, for example through disaster budget tagging.
• Contribute to open data initiatives.
• Collaborate with various stakeholders to improve the accuracy and availability of risk models
Supervisors• Collect (and potentially share) data from insurers on insured losses.• Promote the development of NatCat models to evaluate risk, including encouraging enhanced transparency of the modelling approach and sensitivity of results to key assumptions; provide (scenario) analysis on the root causes and extent of the protection gaps.
(Re)insurers (and modelers/ brokers)• Collect and disseminate relevant NatCat-related data.
• Promote model transparency, helping stakeholders understand and identify potential exposures and the influence of related risks.
• Develop models to enhance risk assessment for regions lacking robust catastrophe data.
• Contribute to open data initiatives.
• Improve resolution and granularity of NatCat modelling to better reflect risk and enhance peril coverage for under-modeled or emerging perils; integrate vulnerability and socioeconomic data in models to betters estimate losses in underserved populations.
International Organisations / Multilateral Development Banks• Support the development and standardisation of NatCat risk data collection and sharing practices; alongside governments, facilitate the collection and dissemination of comprehensive NatCat data at the global level.• Contribute to initiatives aimed at improving modelling capabilities and fostering international collaboration.
Academia / research Centres• Academic and research centers can deepen analysis and provide technical expertise on particular risks and structural vulnerability to NatCat events.

Source: IAIS-WBG (2025): G20 Sustainable Finance Working Group input paper (pages 11-12)